FACT CHECK: SC didn’t rule Marcos’ budget signing unconstitutional
Detailed summary
The Court faulted Congress for raising the President's proposed budget, and with the decision not yet final, no formal probe has been opened
This is AI-generated. Read the article for full context. Report any errors.
Claim: The Supreme Court (SC) ruled that President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s signing of the national budget was unconstitutional.
Why we fact-checked this: A graphic shared by the Facebook page Makata Ng Bayan on November 1 shows an edited photo of Marcos, former chief justice Alexander Gesmundo, and Ombudsman Jesus Crispin “Boying” Remulla.
The text on the graphic reads: “Sinabi na ng Supreme Court na Unconstitutional ang Pagpirma ni Marcos sa Budget! Tungkulin ng Ombudsman, DOJ at COA mag Imbestiga, Pero bakit di nila ginawa? Mga Duwag ba sila o Mukhang Pera?”
Opening of the article, excerpted from Rappler. To read the rest, open the article on the publisher's site.
MarketNews shows the headline and summary published by the outlet. The full article is on the publisher's website. (www.rappler.com)
